RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

For Traders vs Get Funded Now

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

For Traders
FORT
For Traders
EST. 2023
GFND
Get Funded Now
FOR TRADERS
METRIC
GET FUNDED NOW
65/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE90%
$300,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
$200,000
$42BETTER
MIN COST
$123
2d
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

FOR TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
cTrader, TradeLocker, DXtrade

GET FUNDED NOW DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities

For Traders PROS

  • +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Min challenge cost of $42 is dramatically below the industry average of $186.7
  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
  • +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps for faster capital access

For Traders CONS

  • Profit target of 9% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more effort to pass
  • News trading and EA/automated trading are not allowed, limiting strategy flexibility
  • Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, offering less loss tolerance

Get Funded Now PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Single-step evaluation is below the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded
  • +On-demand payouts provide maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits

Get Funded Now CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering less buffer
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation harder to pass
  • Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.70

PROPDNA VERDICT

For Traders
Higher trust score (65/100). Slower payouts at 2d. 90% profit split.
Get Funded Now
Lower trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

For Traders Full Review →Get Funded Now Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy