RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

For Traders vs FundingYourTrades.com

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FORT

For Traders

EST. 2023

FYTR

FundingYourTrades.com

FOR TRADERS

METRIC

FUNDINGYOURTRADES.COM

65/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

90%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$300,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$42

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

FOR TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: cTrader, TradeLocker, DXtrade

FUNDINGYOURTRADES.COM DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

For Traders PROS

+Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
+Min challenge cost of $42 is dramatically below the industry average of $186.7
+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
+Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps for faster capital access

For Traders CONS

−Profit target of 9% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more effort to pass
−News trading and EA/automated trading are not allowed, limiting strategy flexibility
−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, offering less loss tolerance

FundingYourTrades.com PROS

+A listing exists for this firm, indicating some level of industry recognition.
+No confirmed below-average financial metrics are currently on record.
+The firm's tag is registered, suggesting an intent to participate in transparent comparison.
+Absence of restrictive data means no confirmed unfavorable terms are documented.

FundingYourTrades.com CONS

−No data whatsoever is available for this firm, making objective evaluation impossible.
−Traders cannot compare any metrics to industry averages due to complete absence of information.
−Lack of founding date, country, and trading terms represents a significant transparency concern.

PROPDNA VERDICT

For Traders

Higher trust score (65/100). Faster payouts at 2d. 90% profit split.

START WITH FORT