Compare/For Traders vs FTMO

For Traders vs FTMO

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FOR TRADERS DETAILS

MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Crypto, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES: forex, large-cap, multi-asset, Beginner Friendly, Pro Traders, Fast Payout, Large Cap, crypto

+Min challenge cost of $48 is below the listed firms' average of $69.4, reducing entry cost.
+Single evaluation step beats the listed firms' average of 1.6 steps, reaching funding faster.
+Offers three platforms (cTrader, MT5, TradeLocker) and five markets including Crypto and Futures.
+Weekend holding is permitted, giving traders more flexibility to manage open positions.

−Profit split of 80% is below the listed firms' average of 83.2%, reducing trader earnings.
−Max funding of $100,000 is well below the listed firms' average of $310,294.1, limiting scale.
−Payout window of 14 days exceeds the listed firms' average of 9.6 days, meaning longer waits.

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.6%.
+Fee refund is available
+Founded in 2015, giving it one of the longest operational track records in the industry.
+Weekend and overnight holding is allowed during evaluation phases.
+A recently introduced competitive one-step program.

−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5.
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 8.0%, raising the qualification bar.
−News trading is not allowed at funded, restricting strategy options around major economic events.

For Traders

Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Faster payouts (14d). 80% profit split.

FTMO

Trust score 65/100. Faster payouts (14d). 80% profit split.