RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

For Traders vs E8 Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

For Traders
FORT
For Traders
EST. 2023
E8FD
E8 Funding
EST. 2021
FOR TRADERS
METRIC
E8 FUNDING
65/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
$300,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$400,000
$42
MIN COST
BETTER$25
2dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
3d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

FOR TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
cTrader, TradeLocker, DXtrade

E8 FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
MARKETS
Forex, Futures, Crypto

For Traders PROS

  • +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Min challenge cost of $42 is dramatically below the industry average of $186.7
  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
  • +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps for faster capital access

For Traders CONS

  • Profit target of 9% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more effort to pass
  • News trading and EA/automated trading are not allowed, limiting strategy flexibility
  • Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, offering less loss tolerance

E8 Funding PROS

  • +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
  • +Minimum challenge cost of $25 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
  • +On-demand payouts offer more flexibility than fixed or bi-weekly schedules.

E8 Funding CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 3% is significantly below the industry average of 7.9%, leaving very little room for loss.
  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.

PROPDNA VERDICT

For Traders
Higher trust score (65/100). Faster payouts at 2d. 90% profit split.
E8 Funding
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at 3d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

For Traders Full Review →E8 Funding Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy