RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

For Traders vs Blue Guardian Futures

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

For Traders
FORT
For Traders
EST. 2023
BGFT
Blue Guardian Futures
FOR TRADERS
METRIC
BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES
65/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER100%
$300,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$450,000
$42BETTER
MIN COST
$84
2dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
5d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

FOR TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
cTrader, TradeLocker, DXtrade

BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts

For Traders PROS

  • +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Min challenge cost of $42 is dramatically below the industry average of $186.7
  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
  • +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps for faster capital access

For Traders CONS

  • Profit target of 9% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more effort to pass
  • News trading and EA/automated trading are not allowed, limiting strategy flexibility
  • Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, offering less loss tolerance

Blue Guardian Futures PROS

  • +Profit split of 100% is the maximum possible, far exceeding the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Min challenge cost of $84 is well below the industry average of $186.70, reducing entry costs
  • +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, offering a streamlined path to capital
  • +Days to first payout is 5, slightly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days

Blue Guardian Futures CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 3.5% is expressed as a percentage but is exceptionally tight, increasing disqualification risk
  • Max funding of $450,000 is below the industry average of $839,272, limiting maximum earning potential
  • Futures-only market access restricts traders who prefer Forex, Indices, or other asset classes

PROPDNA VERDICT

For Traders
Higher trust score (65/100). Faster payouts at 2d. 90% profit split.
Blue Guardian Futures
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at 5d. 100% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

For Traders Full Review →Blue Guardian Futures Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy