RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

For Traders vs OneFunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

For Traders
FORT
For Traders
EST. 2023
OneFunded
1FND
OneFunded
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2023
FOR TRADERS
METRIC
ONEFUNDED
65/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—55/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER1/5
90%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE90%
$300,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$200,000
$42BETTER
MIN COST
—$59
2dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—14d
—
PASS RATE
35%
0—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER1

FOR TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
cTrader, TradeLocker, DXtrade

ONEFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Crypto, Metals, Stocks
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader
TYPES
forex, beginner, multi-asset, crypto

For Traders PROS

  • +Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Min challenge cost of $42 is dramatically below the industry average of $186.7
  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
  • +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps for faster capital access

For Traders CONS

  • −Profit target of 9% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more effort to pass
  • −News trading and EA/automated trading are not allowed, limiting strategy flexibility
  • −Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, offering less loss tolerance

OneFunded PROS

  • +No time limits on eval
  • +4 challenge tracks
  • +Transparent rules

OneFunded CONS

  • −Days to first payout is 14, more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
  • −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272
  • −Pass rate of 35% suggests moderate selectivity, though no drawdown or profit target data is provided for context

PROPDNA VERDICT

For Traders
Higher trust score (65/100). Faster payouts at 2d. 90% profit split.
OneFunded
Lower trust score (55/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

For Traders Full Review →OneFunded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy