RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FundedNext vs Savius

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FNXT

FundedNext

✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022

SVUS

Savius

EST. 2013

FUNDEDNEXT

METRIC

SAVIUS

88/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

4.4/5BETTER

RATING

—0/5

95%BETTER

PROFIT SPLIT

—90%

$300,000TIE

MAX FUNDING

TIE$300,000

$49BETTER

MIN COST

—$285

4d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER3d

29%

PASS RATE

—

6,750BETTER

REVIEW COUNT

—0

FUNDEDNEXT DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Relative
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Futures, Crypto, Metals, Stocks
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView
TYPES: forex, fast-payout, multi-asset, futures, crypto

SAVIUS DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures, Indices
PLATFORMS: ATAS, Quantower

FundedNext PROS

+Profit split of 95% is well above the industry average of 84.7%.
+Minimum challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
+Days to first payout of 4 is faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Fee refund is offered, and weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.

FundedNext CONS

−Overall drawdown of 10% with a relative drawdown type is above the industry average of 7.9% and more restrictive in practice.
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation harder to pass.
−Max funding of $300,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.

Savius PROS

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
+Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
+Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation

Savius CONS

−Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
−Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
−Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification

PROPDNA VERDICT

FundedNext

Higher trust score (88/100). Slower payouts at 4d. 95% profit split.

START WITH FNXT