RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FundedNext vs RebelsFunding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FundedNext
FNXT
FundedNext
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022
RBLS
RebelsFunding
EST. 2023
FUNDEDNEXT
METRIC
REBELSFUNDING
88/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
0/100
4.4/5BETTER
RATING
0/5
95%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
$300,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$320,000
$49
MIN COST
BETTER$9
4d
PAYOUT DAYS
29%
PASS RATE
6,750BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
0

FUNDEDNEXT DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Relative
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Futures, Crypto, Metals, Stocks
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView
TYPES
forex, fast-payout, multi-asset, futures, crypto

REBELSFUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
4-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex

FundedNext PROS

  • +Profit split of 95% is well above the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +Minimum challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 4 is faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Fee refund is offered, and weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.

FundedNext CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 10% with a relative drawdown type is above the industry average of 7.9% and more restrictive in practice.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation harder to pass.
  • Max funding of $300,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.

RebelsFunding PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $9 is extraordinarily low compared to the industry average of $186.7, minimising entry risk.
  • +Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.
  • +Fee refund is available, giving traders the opportunity to recover the challenge cost.
  • +Fixed drawdown type provides clearly defined and stable risk parameters for traders.

RebelsFunding CONS

  • Steps to funded is 4, far above the industry average of 1.6, requiring significantly more evaluation stages.
  • Max funding of $320,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting potential earnings.
  • Markets are limited to forex only, offering no diversification into indices, metals, commodities, or crypto.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FundedNext
Higher trust score (88/100). Faster payouts at 4d. 95% profit split.
RebelsFunding
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

FundedNext Full Review →RebelsFunding Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy