FundedNext vs Funded Trading Plus

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FUNDEDNEXT DETAILS

+Profit split of 95% is well above the industry average of 84.7%.
+Minimum challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
+Days to first payout of 4 is faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Fee refund is offered, and weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.

−Overall drawdown of 10% with a relative drawdown type is above the industry average of 7.9% and more restrictive in practice.
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation harder to pass.
−Max funding of $300,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.

+On-demand payouts offer faster access to profits than monthly or bi-weekly schedules
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted
+Four platforms supported (cTrader, DXTrade, Match Trader, MT5) offering broad trader choice
+Wide market access including Crypto, Energy, Indices, Metals, Commodities, and FX

−Min challenge cost of $1,759 is dramatically above the industry average of $186.7
−Max funding of $100,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7
−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%

FundedNext

Trust score 55/100. Slower payouts at 21d. 80% profit split.

Funded Trading Plus

Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Faster payouts at 7d. 80% profit split.