RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
FundedNext vs FundedFast
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FNXT
FundedNext
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022
FNDF
FundedFast
FUNDEDNEXT
METRIC
FUNDEDFAST
88/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
4.4/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
95%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
—80%
$300,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$400,000
$49TIE
MIN COST
TIE$49
4dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—7d
29%
PASS RATE
—
6,750BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—0
FUNDEDNEXT DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Relative
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Futures, Crypto, Metals, Stocks
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView
- TYPES
- forex, fast-payout, multi-asset, futures, crypto
FUNDEDFAST DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
FundedNext PROS
- +Profit split of 95% is well above the industry average of 84.7%.
- +Minimum challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Days to first payout of 4 is faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Fee refund is offered, and weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.
FundedNext CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 10% with a relative drawdown type is above the industry average of 7.9% and more restrictive in practice.
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation harder to pass.
- −Max funding of $300,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
FundedFast PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is extremely low compared to the industry average of $186.7
- +Fee refund offered, reducing the net cost of the evaluation process
- +Weekend holding is allowed, providing greater trading flexibility
- +Weekly payout frequency offers faster access to profits than many firms
FundedFast CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating less buffer
- −Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy