RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FundedNext vs Eclipse Trading

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FNXT

FundedNext

✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022

ECLT

Eclipse Trading

EST. 2007

FUNDEDNEXT

METRIC

ECLIPSE TRADING

67/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—43/100

4/5TIE

RATING

TIE4/5

95%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$300,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$49

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

29%

PASS RATE

—

1TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE1

FUNDEDNEXT DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Relative
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Futures, Crypto, Metals, Stocks
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView
TYPES: forex, fast-payout, multi-asset, futures, crypto

ECLIPSE TRADING DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

FundedNext PROS

+Profit split of 95% is well above the industry average of 84.7%.
+Minimum challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
+Days to first payout of 4 is faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Fee refund is offered, and weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.

FundedNext CONS

−Overall drawdown of 10% with a relative drawdown type is above the industry average of 7.9% and more restrictive in practice.
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation harder to pass.
−Max funding of $300,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.

Eclipse Trading PROS

+Founded in 2007, making it one of the longest-established firms in the dataset.
+Country of operation is listed as Hong Kong, indicating an established international presence.
+Longevity since 2007 suggests operational stability over nearly two decades.
+Early founding date may indicate experience navigating multiple market cycles.

Eclipse Trading CONS

−No trading or financial metrics are available to evaluate this firm objectively.
−Without data on profit split, funding, or costs, no meaningful comparison to industry averages is possible.
−Traders cannot assess key terms like drawdown, payout speed, or profit targets from available data.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FundedNext

Higher trust score (67/100). Faster payouts at 4d. 95% profit split.

START WITH FNXT