RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FundedNext vs Audacity Capital

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FundedNext
FNXT
FundedNext
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022
AUDC
Audacity Capital
EST. 2012
FUNDEDNEXT
METRIC
AUDACITY CAPITAL
88/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
60/100
4.4/5BETTER
RATING
3.5/5
95%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
90%
$300,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$2,000,000
$49
MIN COST
BETTER$42
4d
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER0d
29%
PASS RATE
6,750BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
0

FUNDEDNEXT DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Relative
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Futures, Crypto, Metals, Stocks
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView
TYPES
forex, fast-payout, multi-asset, futures, crypto

AUDACITY CAPITAL DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Static
MARKETS
Forex
PLATFORMS
MT5

FundedNext PROS

  • +Profit split of 95% is well above the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +Minimum challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 4 is faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Fee refund is offered, and weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.

FundedNext CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 10% with a relative drawdown type is above the industry average of 7.9% and more restrictive in practice.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation harder to pass.
  • Max funding of $300,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.

Audacity Capital PROS

  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7, offering exceptional capital access.
  • +Min challenge cost of $42 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
  • +Days to first payout of 0 allows immediate profit access, well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, and fee refund is also offered, boosting net returns.

Audacity Capital CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 15% is nearly double the industry average of 7.9%, exposing traders to significantly higher risk.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring stronger performance to complete evaluation.
  • Market coverage is limited to Forex only, restricting diversification across asset classes.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FundedNext
Higher trust score (88/100). Slower payouts at 4d. 95% profit split.
Audacity Capital
Lower trust score (60/100). Faster payouts at 0d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

FundedNext Full Review →Audacity Capital Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy