RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Fintokei vs Savius

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Fintokei
FNTK
Fintokei
EST. 2020
SVUS
Savius
EST. 2013
FINTOKEI
METRIC
SAVIUS
68/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$500,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
$300,000
$99BETTER
MIN COST
$285
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER3d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

FINTOKEI DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, TradingView, cTrader
TYPES
forex, fast-payout, advanced, Beginner Friendly, Pro Traders, Fast Payout, Large Cap, crypto

SAVIUS DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Futures, Indices
PLATFORMS
ATAS, Quantower

Fintokei PROS

  • +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, meaning faster path to funding.
  • +Min challenge cost of $99 is below the industry average of $186.7, reducing upfront cost.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, providing broad trading flexibility.
  • +Fee refund is available, offering traders a chance to recover the challenge cost.

Fintokei CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's earnings share.
  • Max funding of $500,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
  • Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring greater loss tolerance.

Savius PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
  • +Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
  • +Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation

Savius CONS

  • Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
  • Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
  • Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification

PROPDNA VERDICT

Fintokei
Higher trust score (68/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 80% profit split.
Savius
Lower trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 3d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Fintokei Full Review →Savius Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy