RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Fintokei vs FundedFast
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FNTK
Fintokei
EST. 2020
FNDF
FundedFast
FINTOKEI
METRIC
FUNDEDFAST
68/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$500,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$400,000
$99—
MIN COST
BETTER$49
7dTIE
PAYOUT DAYS
TIE7d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
FINTOKEI DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5, TradingView, cTrader
- TYPES
- forex, fast-payout, advanced, Beginner Friendly, Pro Traders, Fast Payout, Large Cap, crypto
FUNDEDFAST DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
Fintokei PROS
- +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, meaning faster path to funding.
- +Min challenge cost of $99 is below the industry average of $186.7, reducing upfront cost.
- +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, providing broad trading flexibility.
- +Fee refund is available, offering traders a chance to recover the challenge cost.
Fintokei CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's earnings share.
- −Max funding of $500,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
- −Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring greater loss tolerance.
FundedFast PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is extremely low compared to the industry average of $186.7
- +Fee refund offered, reducing the net cost of the evaluation process
- +Weekend holding is allowed, providing greater trading flexibility
- +Weekly payout frequency offers faster access to profits than many firms
FundedFast CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating less buffer
- −Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy