RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Fintokei vs FundedFast

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Fintokei
FNTK
Fintokei
EST. 2020
FNDF
FundedFast
FINTOKEI
METRIC
FUNDEDFAST
68/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$500,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
$400,000
$99
MIN COST
BETTER$49
7dTIE
PAYOUT DAYS
TIE7d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

FINTOKEI DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, TradingView, cTrader
TYPES
forex, fast-payout, advanced, Beginner Friendly, Pro Traders, Fast Payout, Large Cap, crypto

FUNDEDFAST DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex

Fintokei PROS

  • +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, meaning faster path to funding.
  • +Min challenge cost of $99 is below the industry average of $186.7, reducing upfront cost.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, providing broad trading flexibility.
  • +Fee refund is available, offering traders a chance to recover the challenge cost.

Fintokei CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's earnings share.
  • Max funding of $500,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
  • Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring greater loss tolerance.

FundedFast PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is extremely low compared to the industry average of $186.7
  • +Fee refund offered, reducing the net cost of the evaluation process
  • +Weekend holding is allowed, providing greater trading flexibility
  • +Weekly payout frequency offers faster access to profits than many firms

FundedFast CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating less buffer
  • Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve

PROPDNA VERDICT

Fintokei
Higher trust score (68/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 80% profit split.
FundedFast
Lower trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Fintokei Full Review →FundedFast Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy