RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Fintokei vs DeiFunded
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FNTK
Fintokei
EST. 2020
DEIF
DeiFunded
FINTOKEI
METRIC
DEIFUNDED
68/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$500,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$99
MIN COST
—
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
FINTOKEI DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5, TradingView, cTrader
- TYPES
- forex, fast-payout, advanced, Beginner Friendly, Pro Traders, Fast Payout, Large Cap, crypto
DEIFUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
Fintokei PROS
- +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, meaning faster path to funding.
- +Min challenge cost of $99 is below the industry average of $186.7, reducing upfront cost.
- +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, providing broad trading flexibility.
- +Fee refund is available, offering traders a chance to recover the challenge cost.
Fintokei CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's earnings share.
- −Max funding of $500,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
- −Overall drawdown of 10% exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, requiring greater loss tolerance.
DeiFunded PROS
- +No data is available to identify any pros for DeiFunded at this time.
- +No platform or market information is provided to assess trading conditions.
- +No funding or cost data is available to compare against industry benchmarks.
- +No profit split or payout data exists to evaluate trader compensation.
DeiFunded CONS
- −No data whatsoever is available for DeiFunded, making any evaluation impossible.
- −Complete absence of key metrics such as drawdown, profit split, and funding is a significant transparency concern.
- −Traders have no basis for comparison against industry averages with zero data disclosed.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy