RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
FundedFirm vs The Trading Pit Futures
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FNFM
FundedFirm
TTPF
The Trading Pit Futures
FUNDEDFIRM
METRIC
THE TRADING PIT FUTURES
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
100%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$100,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$549
MIN COST
—
1d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
FUNDEDFIRM DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
- PLATFORMS
- MT5
THE TRADING PIT FUTURES DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
FundedFirm PROS
- +100% profit split is exceptionally above the industry average of 84.7%
- +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Single-step evaluation is below the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded
- +Fee refund is available, reducing the net cost of the evaluation
FundedFirm CONS
- −Max funding of $100,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.70
- −Min challenge cost of $549 is significantly above the industry average of $186.7
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation harder to pass
The Trading Pit Futures PROS
- +Based in Liechtenstein, which has a well-regulated financial environment offering potential trader protections.
- +No further data is available to substantiate additional pros at this time.
- +No platform or market data is provided to assess trading conditions.
- +No funding or cost data is available to compare against industry benchmarks.
The Trading Pit Futures CONS
- −Almost no operational data is available for The Trading Pit Futures, making comparison impossible.
- −Absence of drawdown, profit split, and funding figures prevents any meaningful evaluation.
- −Note: as a futures firm, drawdown may be expressed in dollar terms and cannot be compared to the 7.9% CFD average.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy