RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FundedFirm vs Pip Traders Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FNFM
FundedFirm
PTFD
Pip Traders Funding
FUNDEDFIRM
METRIC
PIP TRADERS FUNDING
64/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
40/100
3.8/5BETTER
RATING
0/5
100%
PROFIT SPLIT
$100,000
MAX FUNDING
$549
MIN COST
1d
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
4BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
0

FUNDEDFIRM DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex
PLATFORMS
MT5

PIP TRADERS FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

FundedFirm PROS

  • +100% profit split is exceptionally above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Single-step evaluation is below the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the net cost of the evaluation

FundedFirm CONS

  • Max funding of $100,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.70
  • Min challenge cost of $549 is significantly above the industry average of $186.7
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation harder to pass

Pip Traders Funding PROS

  • +The firm name implies a focus on forex funding, which is the most widely traded market globally.
  • +A dedicated funding model suggests a structured approach to trader evaluation and capital allocation.
  • +Pip-based performance naming may indicate a focus on measurable, transparent trading metrics.
  • +Inclusion on a comparison platform indicates some degree of public presence and accountability.

Pip Traders Funding CONS

  • No data has been provided for this firm, making any objective evaluation impossible.
  • Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost data, no industry comparisons can be made.
  • Traders cannot make informed decisions without disclosure of core terms and conditions for this firm.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FundedFirm
Higher trust score (64/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 100% profit split.
Pip Traders Funding
Lower trust score (40/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

FundedFirm Full Review →Pip Traders Funding Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy