RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FundedFirm vs Monevis Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FNFM
FundedFirm
MNVF
Monevis Funding
EST. 2024
FUNDEDFIRM
METRIC
MONEVIS FUNDING
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
100%
PROFIT SPLIT
$100,000
MAX FUNDING
$549
MIN COST
1d
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

FUNDEDFIRM DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex
PLATFORMS
MT5

MONEVIS FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
-phase
DRAWDOWN
Static

FundedFirm PROS

  • +100% profit split is exceptionally above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Single-step evaluation is below the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the net cost of the evaluation

FundedFirm CONS

  • Max funding of $100,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.70
  • Min challenge cost of $549 is significantly above the industry average of $186.7
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation harder to pass

Monevis Funding PROS

  • +Static drawdown type provides a fixed, predictable risk boundary, which some traders prefer for planning.
  • +Czech Republic is an EU-member jurisdiction, which may offer relevant regulatory context.
  • +No platform or market data is available to assess further strengths.
  • +No funding or cost data is provided to compare against industry benchmarks.

Monevis Funding CONS

  • Founded in 2024, making Monevis Funding a very new firm with limited operational track record.
  • No profit split, max funding, or challenge cost data is available for comparison against industry averages.
  • Lack of transparency around key metrics is a concern for traders making informed decisions.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FundedFirm
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 100% profit split.
Monevis Funding
Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

FundedFirm Full Review →Monevis Funding Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy