FundedFirm vs Goat Funded Futures

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FUNDEDFIRM DETAILS

+100% profit split is exceptionally above the industry average of 84.7%
+Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
+Single-step evaluation is below the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded
+Fee refund is available, reducing the net cost of the evaluation

−Max funding of $100,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.70
−Min challenge cost of $549 is significantly above the industry average of $186.7
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation harder to pass

+Listed as a futures firm, providing access to an asset class not offered by all prop firms.
+Hong Kong base may offer access to Asian market hours and related futures instruments.
+Futures markets offer high liquidity and defined contract structures attractive to professional traders.
+Specialisation in futures suggests a focused and potentially expert evaluation framework.

−No trading data has been provided for this firm, making objective comparison impossible.
−Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no industry benchmarks can be applied.
−Traders cannot assess suitability or value without disclosure of core terms and conditions.

FundedFirm

Higher trust score (64/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 90% profit split.

Goat Funded Futures

Lower trust score (63/100). Slower payouts at 2d. 90% profit split.