RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
FundedFirm vs Audacity Capital
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FNFM
FundedFirm
AUDC
Audacity Capital
EST. 2012
FUNDEDFIRM
METRIC
AUDACITY CAPITAL
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER60/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER3.5/5
100%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
—90%
$100,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$2,000,000
$549—
MIN COST
BETTER$42
1d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER0d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
FUNDEDFIRM DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
- PLATFORMS
- MT5
AUDACITY CAPITAL DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Static
- MARKETS
- Forex
- PLATFORMS
- MT5
FundedFirm PROS
- +100% profit split is exceptionally above the industry average of 84.7%
- +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Single-step evaluation is below the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded
- +Fee refund is available, reducing the net cost of the evaluation
FundedFirm CONS
- −Max funding of $100,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.70
- −Min challenge cost of $549 is significantly above the industry average of $186.7
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation harder to pass
Audacity Capital PROS
- +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7, offering exceptional capital access.
- +Min challenge cost of $42 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
- +Days to first payout of 0 allows immediate profit access, well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, and fee refund is also offered, boosting net returns.
Audacity Capital CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 15% is nearly double the industry average of 7.9%, exposing traders to significantly higher risk.
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring stronger performance to complete evaluation.
- −Market coverage is limited to Forex only, restricting diversification across asset classes.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy