RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
FundedFirm vs Aqua Funded
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FNFM
FundedFirm
AQUA
Aqua Funded
EST. 2023
FUNDEDFIRM
METRIC
AQUA FUNDED
64/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—59/100
3.8/5—
RATING
BETTER4/5
100%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
—90%
$100,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$2,000,000
$549—
MIN COST
BETTER$1
1dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—7d
—
PASS RATE
—
4BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—2
FUNDEDFIRM DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
- PLATFORMS
- MT5
AQUA FUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker
FundedFirm PROS
- +100% profit split is exceptionally above the industry average of 84.7%
- +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Single-step evaluation is below the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded
- +Fee refund is available, reducing the net cost of the evaluation
FundedFirm CONS
- −Max funding of $100,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.70
- −Min challenge cost of $549 is significantly above the industry average of $186.7
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation harder to pass
Aqua Funded PROS
- +Min challenge cost of just $1 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7, making it highly accessible.
- +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
- +Profit split of 90% significantly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
- +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering maximum trading flexibility.
Aqua Funded CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to manage larger potential losses.
- −Profit target of 10% is higher than the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
- −Days to first payout of 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy