RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Funded Traders vs SCALP Trade
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FNDT
Funded Traders
SCLT
SCALP Trade
EST. 2009
FUNDED TRADERS
METRIC
SCALP TRADE
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$600,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$489
MIN COST
—
—
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
FUNDED TRADERS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- PLATFORMS
- Match-Trader, DXTrade, cTrader
SCALP TRADE DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
- MARKETS
- Stocks
Funded Traders PROS
- +Overall drawdown of 8% is close to the industry average of 7.9%, representing a balanced risk threshold.
- +Fixed drawdown type provides predictable and clearly defined risk limits for traders.
- +News trading is allowed, supporting a broader range of active trading strategies.
- +Multiple platforms including Match-Trader, DXTrade, and cTrader offer flexibility in trading environment.
Funded Traders CONS
- −Min challenge cost of $489 is drastically above the industry average of $186.7, making entry significantly more expensive.
- −Key data including profit split, days to first payout, and payout frequency are not provided, limiting transparency.
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to complete.
SCALP Trade PROS
- +Offers Stocks trading, a relatively uncommon market among prop firms providing niche opportunity
- +Founded in 2009, giving it over 15 years of operational history and longevity
- +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
- +Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
SCALP Trade CONS
- −No profit split, funding cap, drawdown, or payout data is available for comparison
- −Absence of key metrics makes it impossible to evaluate this firm against industry averages
- −Limited data is itself a transparency concern for traders making financial decisions
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy