RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Funded Traders vs PipFarm

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FNDT
Funded Traders
PipFarm
PFAR
PipFarm
EST. 2023
FUNDED TRADERS
METRIC
PIPFARM
0/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER72/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
PROFIT SPLIT
85%
$600,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
$200,000
$489
MIN COST
BETTER$45
PAYOUT DAYS
7d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

FUNDED TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
PLATFORMS
Match-Trader, DXTrade, cTrader

PIPFARM DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, fast-payout

Funded Traders PROS

  • +Overall drawdown of 8% is close to the industry average of 7.9%, representing a balanced risk threshold.
  • +Fixed drawdown type provides predictable and clearly defined risk limits for traders.
  • +News trading is allowed, supporting a broader range of active trading strategies.
  • +Multiple platforms including Match-Trader, DXTrade, and cTrader offer flexibility in trading environment.

Funded Traders CONS

  • Min challenge cost of $489 is drastically above the industry average of $186.7, making entry significantly more expensive.
  • Key data including profit split, days to first payout, and payout frequency are not provided, limiting transparency.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to complete.

PipFarm PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $45 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
  • +Profit split of 85% slightly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +News trading, EA/automated trading, and weekend holding are all permitted.

PipFarm CONS

  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5.
  • Founded in 2023, offering a limited operational track record for traders to assess.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Funded Traders
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.
PipFarm
Higher trust score (72/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Funded Traders Full Review →PipFarm Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy