RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Funded Traders vs Nino Options

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FNDT

Funded Traders

NINO

Nino Options

FUNDED TRADERS

METRIC

NINO OPTIONS

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$600,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$489

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

FUNDED TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
PLATFORMS: Match-Trader, DXTrade, cTrader

NINO OPTIONS DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

Funded Traders PROS

+Overall drawdown of 8% is close to the industry average of 7.9%, representing a balanced risk threshold.
+Fixed drawdown type provides predictable and clearly defined risk limits for traders.
+News trading is allowed, supporting a broader range of active trading strategies.
+Multiple platforms including Match-Trader, DXTrade, and cTrader offer flexibility in trading environment.

Funded Traders CONS

−Min challenge cost of $489 is drastically above the industry average of $186.7, making entry significantly more expensive.
−Key data including profit split, days to first payout, and payout frequency are not provided, limiting transparency.
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to complete.

Nino Options PROS

+No data is available on profit split, funding, or cost metrics for this firm
+No data is available on drawdown or profit target for this firm
+No data is available on payout timing or steps to funded for this firm
+No data is available on platforms, markets, or founding date for this firm

Nino Options CONS

−Virtually no data is provided, making any objective evaluation impossible
−Traders cannot compare this firm's terms to the industry average of 84.7% profit split
−Lack of transparency on key metrics is a significant risk for traders making financial decisions

PROPDNA VERDICT