RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Funded Traders vs FundedFast
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FNDT
Funded Traders
FNDF
FundedFast
FUNDED TRADERS
METRIC
FUNDEDFAST
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
$600,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$400,000
$489—
MIN COST
BETTER$49
—
PAYOUT DAYS
7d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
FUNDED TRADERS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- PLATFORMS
- Match-Trader, DXTrade, cTrader
FUNDEDFAST DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
Funded Traders PROS
- +Overall drawdown of 8% is close to the industry average of 7.9%, representing a balanced risk threshold.
- +Fixed drawdown type provides predictable and clearly defined risk limits for traders.
- +News trading is allowed, supporting a broader range of active trading strategies.
- +Multiple platforms including Match-Trader, DXTrade, and cTrader offer flexibility in trading environment.
Funded Traders CONS
- −Min challenge cost of $489 is drastically above the industry average of $186.7, making entry significantly more expensive.
- −Key data including profit split, days to first payout, and payout frequency are not provided, limiting transparency.
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to complete.
FundedFast PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is extremely low compared to the industry average of $186.7
- +Fee refund offered, reducing the net cost of the evaluation process
- +Weekend holding is allowed, providing greater trading flexibility
- +Weekly payout frequency offers faster access to profits than many firms
FundedFast CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating less buffer
- −Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy