RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Funded Traders vs Blue Guardian
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FNDT
Funded Traders
BLGD
Blue Guardian
FUNDED TRADERS
METRIC
BLUE GUARDIAN
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
90%
$600,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$400,000
$489
MIN COST
—
—
PAYOUT DAYS
7d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
FUNDED TRADERS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- PLATFORMS
- Match-Trader, DXTrade, cTrader
BLUE GUARDIAN DETAILS
- STEPS
- 3-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Forex, Futures
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts
Funded Traders PROS
- +Overall drawdown of 8% is close to the industry average of 7.9%, representing a balanced risk threshold.
- +Fixed drawdown type provides predictable and clearly defined risk limits for traders.
- +News trading is allowed, supporting a broader range of active trading strategies.
- +Multiple platforms including Match-Trader, DXTrade, and cTrader offer flexibility in trading environment.
Funded Traders CONS
- −Min challenge cost of $489 is drastically above the industry average of $186.7, making entry significantly more expensive.
- −Key data including profit split, days to first payout, and payout frequency are not provided, limiting transparency.
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to complete.
Blue Guardian PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
- +On-demand payout frequency offers maximum withdrawal flexibility
- +Max funding of $400,000 provides substantial capital access for traders
- +Offers both Forex and Futures markets, giving traders access to multiple asset classes
Blue Guardian CONS
- −Three steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages
- −Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less loss tolerance
- −No min challenge cost or profit target data is provided for full comparison
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy