RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Funded Traders vs Blueberry Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FNDT
Funded Traders
Blueberry Funded
BBFD
Blueberry Funded
EST. 2024
FUNDED TRADERS
METRIC
BLUEBERRY FUNDED
0/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER68/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
$600,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$2,000,000
$489
MIN COST
BETTER$139
PAYOUT DAYS
14d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

FUNDED TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
PLATFORMS
Match-Trader, DXTrade, cTrader

BLUEBERRY FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto, Stocks
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, DXtrade
TYPES
Beginner Friendly, Low Cost

Funded Traders PROS

  • +Overall drawdown of 8% is close to the industry average of 7.9%, representing a balanced risk threshold.
  • +Fixed drawdown type provides predictable and clearly defined risk limits for traders.
  • +News trading is allowed, supporting a broader range of active trading strategies.
  • +Multiple platforms including Match-Trader, DXTrade, and cTrader offer flexibility in trading environment.

Funded Traders CONS

  • Min challenge cost of $489 is drastically above the industry average of $186.7, making entry significantly more expensive.
  • Key data including profit split, days to first payout, and payout frequency are not provided, limiting transparency.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to complete.

Blueberry Funded PROS

  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7, offering strong scaling potential.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, providing maximum trading flexibility.
  • +Wide platform selection including MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, and DXtrade covers most trader preferences.
  • +Markets include stocks in addition to forex, indices, commodities, metals, and crypto, offering broad diversification.

Blueberry Funded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller share of earnings.
  • Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying trader income.
  • No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost after passing.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Funded Traders
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.
Blueberry Funded
Higher trust score (68/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Funded Traders Full Review →Blueberry Funded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy