RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Funded Traders vs Aqua Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FNDT

Funded Traders

AQUA

Aqua Funded

EST. 2023

FUNDED TRADERS

METRIC

AQUA FUNDED

40/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER59/100

0/5—

RATING

BETTER4/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

90%

$600,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$2,000,000

$489—

MIN COST

BETTER$1

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER2

FUNDED TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
PLATFORMS: Match-Trader, DXTrade, cTrader

AQUA FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

Funded Traders PROS

+Overall drawdown of 8% is close to the industry average of 7.9%, representing a balanced risk threshold.
+Fixed drawdown type provides predictable and clearly defined risk limits for traders.
+News trading is allowed, supporting a broader range of active trading strategies.
+Multiple platforms including Match-Trader, DXTrade, and cTrader offer flexibility in trading environment.

Funded Traders CONS

−Min challenge cost of $489 is drastically above the industry average of $186.7, making entry significantly more expensive.
−Key data including profit split, days to first payout, and payout frequency are not provided, limiting transparency.
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to complete.

Aqua Funded PROS

+Min challenge cost of just $1 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7, making it highly accessible.
+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Profit split of 90% significantly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering maximum trading flexibility.

Aqua Funded CONS

−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to manage larger potential losses.
−Profit target of 10% is higher than the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
−Days to first payout of 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Funded Traders

Lower trust score (40/100). Slower payouts at —d.

START WITH FNDT