RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Funding Traders vs Topstep
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FNDG
Funding Traders
TOPS
Topstep
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2012
FUNDING TRADERS
METRIC
TOPSTEP
51/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER69/100
4/5BETTER
RATING
—3/5
90%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE90%
$400,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$150,000
$25BETTER
MIN COST
—$49
14d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER7d
—
PASS RATE
28%
1—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER3
FUNDING TRADERS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks
TOPSTEP DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- futures, beginner
Funding Traders PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $25 is far below the industry average of $186.7, making evaluation highly affordable.
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, with a fee refund also available to traders.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation threshold easier to achieve.
- +Covers five asset classes including Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, and Stocks, offering strong diversification.
Funding Traders CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing a tighter risk boundary for traders.
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying profit access.
- −Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting maximum earning potential.
Topstep PROS
- +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%, offering traders a superior earnings share.
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
- +Single-step funding is better than the industry average of 1.6 steps, streamlining the path to funded status.
- +Founded in 2012, Topstep is one of the most established prop firms, providing strong credibility and track record.
Topstep CONS
- −Max funding of $150,000 is far below the industry average of $839,272.7, significantly limiting earning potential.
- −Overall drawdown of 10% with trailing EOD type means drawdown limits tighten as profits grow, increasing risk.
- −Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5, a minor but notable delay.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy