RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Funding Traders vs SCALP Trade

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FNDG

Funding Traders

SCLT

SCALP Trade

EST. 2009

FUNDING TRADERS

METRIC

SCALP TRADE

51/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—46/100

4/5TIE

RATING

TIE4/5

90%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$400,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$25

MIN COST

—

14d

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

1—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER2

FUNDING TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks

SCALP TRADE DETAILS

STEPS: -phase
MARKETS: Stocks

Funding Traders PROS

+Min challenge cost of $25 is far below the industry average of $186.7, making evaluation highly affordable.
+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, with a fee refund also available to traders.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation threshold easier to achieve.
+Covers five asset classes including Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, and Stocks, offering strong diversification.

Funding Traders CONS

−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing a tighter risk boundary for traders.
−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying profit access.
−Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting maximum earning potential.

SCALP Trade PROS

+Offers Stocks trading, a relatively uncommon market among prop firms providing niche opportunity
+Founded in 2009, giving it over 15 years of operational history and longevity
+Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification
+Placeholder pro — limited data prevents further above-average metric identification

SCALP Trade CONS

−No profit split, funding cap, drawdown, or payout data is available for comparison
−Absence of key metrics makes it impossible to evaluate this firm against industry averages
−Limited data is itself a transparency concern for traders making financial decisions

PROPDNA VERDICT

Funding Traders

Higher trust score (51/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.

START WITH FNDG