RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Funding Traders vs Monevis Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FNDG

Funding Traders

MNVF

Monevis Funding

EST. 2024

FUNDING TRADERS

METRIC

MONEVIS FUNDING

51/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—41/100

4/5BETTER

RATING

—1.5/5

90%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$400,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$25

MIN COST

—

14d

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

1—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER2

FUNDING TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks

MONEVIS FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: -phase
DRAWDOWN: Static

Funding Traders PROS

+Min challenge cost of $25 is far below the industry average of $186.7, making evaluation highly affordable.
+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, with a fee refund also available to traders.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation threshold easier to achieve.
+Covers five asset classes including Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, and Stocks, offering strong diversification.

Funding Traders CONS

−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing a tighter risk boundary for traders.
−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying profit access.
−Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting maximum earning potential.

Monevis Funding PROS

+Static drawdown type provides a fixed, predictable risk boundary, which some traders prefer for planning.
+Czech Republic is an EU-member jurisdiction, which may offer relevant regulatory context.
+No platform or market data is available to assess further strengths.
+No funding or cost data is provided to compare against industry benchmarks.

Monevis Funding CONS

−Founded in 2024, making Monevis Funding a very new firm with limited operational track record.
−No profit split, max funding, or challenge cost data is available for comparison against industry averages.
−Lack of transparency around key metrics is a concern for traders making informed decisions.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Funding Traders

Higher trust score (51/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.

START WITH FNDG