RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Funding Traders vs Ment Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FNDG
Funding Traders
MNTF
Ment Funding
FUNDING TRADERS
METRIC
MENT FUNDING
51/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE51/100
4/5
RATING
BETTER5/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
$25
MIN COST
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
1
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER4

FUNDING TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks

MENT FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

Funding Traders PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $25 is far below the industry average of $186.7, making evaluation highly affordable.
  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, with a fee refund also available to traders.
  • +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation threshold easier to achieve.
  • +Covers five asset classes including Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, and Stocks, offering strong diversification.

Funding Traders CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing a tighter risk boundary for traders.
  • Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying profit access.
  • Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting maximum earning potential.

Ment Funding PROS

  • +Listed on PropDNA, giving traders a reference point for discovery
  • +No restrictive data points provided that could indicate unfavorable terms
  • +Absence of negative metrics means no confirmed below-average figures
  • +Firm identity is established enough to be catalogued for comparison

Ment Funding CONS

  • No data provided on profit split, max funding, or challenge cost
  • No trading conditions such as drawdown, profit target, or payout terms are available
  • Traders cannot make an informed decision without any comparable metrics

PROPDNA VERDICT

Funding Traders
Higher trust score (51/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.
Ment Funding
Higher trust score (51/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

Funding Traders Full Review →Ment Funding Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy