RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Funding Traders vs FundedFast

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FNDG

Funding Traders

FNDF

FundedFast

FUNDING TRADERS

METRIC

FUNDEDFAST

51/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER56/100

4/5BETTER

RATING

—2.57/5

90%BETTER

PROFIT SPLIT

—80%

$400,000TIE

MAX FUNDING

TIE$400,000

$25BETTER

MIN COST

—$49

14d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER7d

—

PASS RATE

—

1—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER2

FUNDING TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks

FUNDEDFAST DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex

Funding Traders PROS

+Min challenge cost of $25 is far below the industry average of $186.7, making evaluation highly affordable.
+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, with a fee refund also available to traders.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation threshold easier to achieve.
+Covers five asset classes including Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, and Stocks, offering strong diversification.

Funding Traders CONS

−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing a tighter risk boundary for traders.
−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying profit access.
−Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting maximum earning potential.

FundedFast PROS

+Min challenge cost of $49 is extremely low compared to the industry average of $186.7
+Fee refund offered, reducing the net cost of the evaluation process
+Weekend holding is allowed, providing greater trading flexibility
+Weekly payout frequency offers faster access to profits than many firms

FundedFast CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating less buffer
−Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve

PROPDNA VERDICT

Funding Traders

Lower trust score (51/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.

START WITH FNDG