RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Funding Traders vs Blue Guardian

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FNDG

Funding Traders

BLGD

Blue Guardian

FUNDING TRADERS

METRIC

BLUE GUARDIAN

51/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER55/100

4/5BETTER

RATING

—3/5

90%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE90%

$400,000TIE

MAX FUNDING

TIE$400,000

$25

MIN COST

—

14d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER7d

—

PASS RATE

—

1TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE1

FUNDING TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks

BLUE GUARDIAN DETAILS

STEPS: 3-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Forex, Futures
PLATFORMS: MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts

Funding Traders PROS

+Min challenge cost of $25 is far below the industry average of $186.7, making evaluation highly affordable.
+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, with a fee refund also available to traders.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation threshold easier to achieve.
+Covers five asset classes including Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, and Stocks, offering strong diversification.

Funding Traders CONS

−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing a tighter risk boundary for traders.
−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying profit access.
−Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting maximum earning potential.

Blue Guardian PROS

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
+On-demand payout frequency offers maximum withdrawal flexibility
+Max funding of $400,000 provides substantial capital access for traders
+Offers both Forex and Futures markets, giving traders access to multiple asset classes

Blue Guardian CONS

−Three steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages
−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less loss tolerance
−No min challenge cost or profit target data is provided for full comparison

PROPDNA VERDICT

Funding Traders

Lower trust score (51/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.

START WITH FNDG