RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Funding Traders vs Blue Guardian Futures

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FNDG

Funding Traders

BGFT

Blue Guardian Futures

FUNDING TRADERS

METRIC

BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES

51/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER61/100

4/5—

RATING

BETTER4.29/5

90%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER100%

$400,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$450,000

$25BETTER

MIN COST

—$84

14d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER5d

—

PASS RATE

—

1—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER3

FUNDING TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks

BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts

Funding Traders PROS

+Min challenge cost of $25 is far below the industry average of $186.7, making evaluation highly affordable.
+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, with a fee refund also available to traders.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation threshold easier to achieve.
+Covers five asset classes including Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, and Stocks, offering strong diversification.

Funding Traders CONS

−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing a tighter risk boundary for traders.
−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying profit access.
−Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting maximum earning potential.

Blue Guardian Futures PROS

+Profit split of 100% is the maximum possible, far exceeding the industry average of 84.7%
+Min challenge cost of $84 is well below the industry average of $186.70, reducing entry costs
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, offering a streamlined path to capital
+Days to first payout is 5, slightly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days

Blue Guardian Futures CONS

−Overall drawdown of 3.5% is expressed as a percentage but is exceptionally tight, increasing disqualification risk
−Max funding of $450,000 is below the industry average of $839,272, limiting maximum earning potential
−Futures-only market access restricts traders who prefer Forex, Indices, or other asset classes

PROPDNA VERDICT

Funding Traders

Lower trust score (51/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.

START WITH FNDG