RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FundedFast vs The Funded Trader

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FNDF
FundedFast
TFTR
The Funded Trader
FUNDEDFAST
METRIC
THE FUNDED TRADER
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$600,000
$49BETTER
MIN COST
$489
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

FUNDEDFAST DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex

THE FUNDED TRADER DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
PLATFORMS
MATCH-TRADER, DXTrade, cTrader

FundedFast PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is extremely low compared to the industry average of $186.7
  • +Fee refund offered, reducing the net cost of the evaluation process
  • +Weekend holding is allowed, providing greater trading flexibility
  • +Weekly payout frequency offers faster access to profits than many firms

FundedFast CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating less buffer
  • Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve

The Funded Trader PROS

  • +News trading is explicitly allowed, giving traders more strategic flexibility during high-impact events.
  • +Offers three platforms including MATCH-TRADER, DXTrade, and cTrader, well above typical single-platform firms.
  • +Overall drawdown of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, broadly in line with norms.
  • +Max funding of $600,000 is below the industry average of $839,272.7 but still a substantial capital allocation.

The Funded Trader CONS

  • Min challenge cost of $489 is significantly above the industry average of $186.7, raising the barrier to entry.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring stronger performance to pass evaluation.
  • Two steps to funded exceeds the industry average of 1.6, adding time and cost before reaching a live account.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FundedFast
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 80% profit split.
The Funded Trader
Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

FundedFast Full Review →The Funded Trader Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy