RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FundedFast vs Pip Traders Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FNDF
FundedFast
PTFD
Pip Traders Funding
FUNDEDFAST
METRIC
PIP TRADERS FUNDING
56/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
40/100
2.57/5BETTER
RATING
0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
$49
MIN COST
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
2BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
0

FUNDEDFAST DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex

PIP TRADERS FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

FundedFast PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is extremely low compared to the industry average of $186.7
  • +Fee refund offered, reducing the net cost of the evaluation process
  • +Weekend holding is allowed, providing greater trading flexibility
  • +Weekly payout frequency offers faster access to profits than many firms

FundedFast CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating less buffer
  • Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve

Pip Traders Funding PROS

  • +The firm name implies a focus on forex funding, which is the most widely traded market globally.
  • +A dedicated funding model suggests a structured approach to trader evaluation and capital allocation.
  • +Pip-based performance naming may indicate a focus on measurable, transparent trading metrics.
  • +Inclusion on a comparison platform indicates some degree of public presence and accountability.

Pip Traders Funding CONS

  • No data has been provided for this firm, making any objective evaluation impossible.
  • Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost data, no industry comparisons can be made.
  • Traders cannot make informed decisions without disclosure of core terms and conditions for this firm.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FundedFast
Higher trust score (56/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 80% profit split.
Pip Traders Funding
Lower trust score (40/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

FundedFast Full Review →Pip Traders Funding Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy