Compare/FundedFast vs FTMO

FundedFast vs FTMO

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FUNDEDFAST DETAILS

MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Crypto, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES: forex, large-cap, multi-asset, Beginner Friendly, Pro Traders, Fast Payout, Large Cap, crypto

+Max funding reaches $400,000, well above the listed-firm average of $310,294.
+Overall drawdown allowance is 10%, higher than the listed-firm average of 7.9%.
+Min challenge cost of $49 is below the listed-firm average of $69.40.
+Payout window of 7 days is faster than the listed-firm average of 9.6 days.

−Profit split of 80% falls below the listed-firm average of 83.2%.
−Steps to funded is 2, above the listed-firm average of 1.6.
−Profit target of 8% matches but does not beat the listed-firm average of 8.1%, offering no advantage.

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.6%.
+Fee refund is available
+Founded in 2015, giving it one of the longest operational track records in the industry.
+Weekend and overnight holding is allowed during evaluation phases.
+A recently introduced competitive one-step program.

−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5.
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 8.0%, raising the qualification bar.
−News trading is not allowed at funded, restricting strategy options around major economic events.

FundedFast

Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Faster payouts (7d). 80% profit split.

FTMO

Trust score 65/100. Slower payouts (14d). 80% profit split.