RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
FundedFast vs Funding Traders
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FNDF
FundedFast
FNDG
Funding Traders
FUNDEDFAST
METRIC
FUNDING TRADERS
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER60/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER3.5/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$400,000TIE
MAX FUNDING
TIE$400,000
$49—
MIN COST
BETTER$25
7dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—14d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
FUNDEDFAST DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
FUNDING TRADERS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks
FundedFast PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is extremely low compared to the industry average of $186.7
- +Fee refund offered, reducing the net cost of the evaluation process
- +Weekend holding is allowed, providing greater trading flexibility
- +Weekly payout frequency offers faster access to profits than many firms
FundedFast CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating less buffer
- −Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
Funding Traders PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $25 is far below the industry average of $186.7, making evaluation highly affordable.
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, with a fee refund also available to traders.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation threshold easier to achieve.
- +Covers five asset classes including Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, and Stocks, offering strong diversification.
Funding Traders CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing a tighter risk boundary for traders.
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying profit access.
- −Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting maximum earning potential.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy