RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FundedFast vs FundedPrime

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FNDF

FundedFast

FDPM

FundedPrime

FUNDEDFAST

METRIC

FUNDEDPRIME

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$400,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$49

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

FUNDEDFAST DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex

FUNDEDPRIME DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

FundedFast PROS

+Min challenge cost of $49 is extremely low compared to the industry average of $186.7
+Fee refund offered, reducing the net cost of the evaluation process
+Weekend holding is allowed, providing greater trading flexibility
+Weekly payout frequency offers faster access to profits than many firms

FundedFast CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating less buffer
−Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve

FundedPrime PROS

+Listed on PropDNA, providing traders a point of reference
+No confirmed below-average metrics due to absence of data
+Firm identity is established enough to be catalogued for comparison
+No restrictive trading conditions are confirmed from available data

FundedPrime CONS

−No data provided on profit split, max funding, or challenge cost
−No trading conditions such as drawdown, profit target, or payout terms are available
−Traders cannot meaningfully compare this firm to industry averages without data

PROPDNA VERDICT

FundedFast

Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 80% profit split.

START WITH FNDF