RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
FundedFast vs Bulenox
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FNDF
FundedFast
BLNX
Bulenox
EST. 2022
FUNDEDFAST
METRIC
BULENOX
56/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER57/100
2.57/5—
RATING
BETTER4.29/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$400,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$150,000
$49BETTER
MIN COST
—$99
7dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—14d
—
PASS RATE
—
2—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER3
FUNDEDFAST DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
BULENOX DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, Rithmic, Tradovate
- TYPES
- futures
FundedFast PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is extremely low compared to the industry average of $186.7
- +Fee refund offered, reducing the net cost of the evaluation process
- +Weekend holding is allowed, providing greater trading flexibility
- +Weekly payout frequency offers faster access to profits than many firms
FundedFast CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating less buffer
- −Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
Bulenox PROS
- +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation easier to pass.
- +Supports multiple platforms including NinjaTrader, Rithmic, and Tradovate.
- +News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted.
Bulenox CONS
- −Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy