RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

FundedFast vs Bulenox

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FNDF
FundedFast
Bulenox
BLNX
Bulenox
EST. 2022
FUNDEDFAST
METRIC
BULENOX
56/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER57/100
2.57/5
RATING
BETTER4.29/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$400,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
$150,000
$49BETTER
MIN COST
$99
7dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
14d
PASS RATE
2
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER3

FUNDEDFAST DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex

BULENOX DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Rithmic, Tradovate
TYPES
futures

FundedFast PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is extremely low compared to the industry average of $186.7
  • +Fee refund offered, reducing the net cost of the evaluation process
  • +Weekend holding is allowed, providing greater trading flexibility
  • +Weekly payout frequency offers faster access to profits than many firms

FundedFast CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating less buffer
  • Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve

Bulenox PROS

  • +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
  • +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation easier to pass.
  • +Supports multiple platforms including NinjaTrader, Rithmic, and Tradovate.
  • +News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted.

Bulenox CONS

  • Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.

PROPDNA VERDICT

FundedFast
Lower trust score (56/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 80% profit split.
Bulenox
Higher trust score (57/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

FundedFast Full Review →Bulenox Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy