RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Finotive Funding vs RebelsFunding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Finotive Funding
FINO
Finotive Funding
EST. 2022
RBLS
RebelsFunding
EST. 2023
FINOTIVE FUNDING
METRIC
REBELSFUNDING
72/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
$300,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$320,000
$49
MIN COST
BETTER$9
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

FINOTIVE FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex

REBELSFUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
4-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex

Finotive Funding PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7
  • +On-demand payouts offer greater flexibility than monthly or bi-weekly schedules
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, maximising trading flexibility

Finotive Funding CONS

  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation
  • Max funding of $300,000 is below the industry average of $839,272.7
  • Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps

RebelsFunding PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $9 is extraordinarily low compared to the industry average of $186.7, minimising entry risk.
  • +Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.
  • +Fee refund is available, giving traders the opportunity to recover the challenge cost.
  • +Fixed drawdown type provides clearly defined and stable risk parameters for traders.

RebelsFunding CONS

  • Steps to funded is 4, far above the industry average of 1.6, requiring significantly more evaluation stages.
  • Max funding of $320,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting potential earnings.
  • Markets are limited to forex only, offering no diversification into indices, metals, commodities, or crypto.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Finotive Funding
Higher trust score (72/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.
RebelsFunding
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Finotive Funding Full Review →RebelsFunding Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy