RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Finotive Funding vs RebelsFunding
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
FINO
Finotive Funding
EST. 2022
RBLS
RebelsFunding
EST. 2023
FINOTIVE FUNDING
METRIC
REBELSFUNDING
72/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
—80%
$300,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$320,000
$49—
MIN COST
BETTER$9
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
FINOTIVE FUNDING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- forex
REBELSFUNDING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 4-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
Finotive Funding PROS
- +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7
- +On-demand payouts offer greater flexibility than monthly or bi-weekly schedules
- +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, maximising trading flexibility
Finotive Funding CONS
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation
- −Max funding of $300,000 is below the industry average of $839,272.7
- −Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps
RebelsFunding PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $9 is extraordinarily low compared to the industry average of $186.7, minimising entry risk.
- +Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.
- +Fee refund is available, giving traders the opportunity to recover the challenge cost.
- +Fixed drawdown type provides clearly defined and stable risk parameters for traders.
RebelsFunding CONS
- −Steps to funded is 4, far above the industry average of 1.6, requiring significantly more evaluation stages.
- −Max funding of $320,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting potential earnings.
- −Markets are limited to forex only, offering no diversification into indices, metals, commodities, or crypto.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy