RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Finotive Funding vs QT Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FINO

Finotive Funding

EST. 2022

QT Funded

EST. 2023

FINOTIVE FUNDING

METRIC

QT FUNDED

72/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE72/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

90%BETTER

PROFIT SPLIT

—80%

$300,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$400,000

$49—

MIN COST

BETTER$12

7d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER1d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

FINOTIVE FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5
TYPES: forex

QT FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker

Finotive Funding PROS

+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
+Min challenge cost of $49 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7
+On-demand payouts offer greater flexibility than monthly or bi-weekly schedules
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, maximising trading flexibility

Finotive Funding CONS

−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation
−Max funding of $300,000 is below the industry average of $839,272.7
−Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps

QT Funded PROS

+Minimum challenge cost of $12 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7.
+Days to first payout of 1 day is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
+Profit target of 7% is below the industry average of 8%, making the target easier to hit.

QT Funded CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
−News trading is not allowed, restricting a commonly used trading strategy.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Finotive Funding

Higher trust score (72/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.

START WITH FINO