RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Finotive Funding vs Matrix Executions

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FINO

Finotive Funding

EST. 2022

MTRX

Matrix Executions

EST. 2018

FINOTIVE FUNDING

METRIC

MATRIX EXECUTIONS

72/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

90%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$300,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$49

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

FINOTIVE FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5
TYPES: forex

MATRIX EXECUTIONS DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

Finotive Funding PROS

+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
+Min challenge cost of $49 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7
+On-demand payouts offer greater flexibility than monthly or bi-weekly schedules
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, maximising trading flexibility

Finotive Funding CONS

−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation
−Max funding of $300,000 is below the industry average of $839,272.7
−Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps

Matrix Executions PROS

+Founded in 2018, Matrix Executions has a longer operating history than most prop firms, suggesting stability.
+No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
+No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
+No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.

Matrix Executions CONS

−Almost no firm data is provided beyond founding year, making meaningful comparison to industry averages impossible.
−Without profit split, funding, or challenge cost data, traders cannot evaluate value against industry benchmarks.
−Lack of transparency on payout, drawdown, and trading rules limits trader decision-making confidence significantly.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Finotive Funding

Higher trust score (72/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.

START WITH FINO