RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Finotive Funding vs Funded Futures Network

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FINO

Finotive Funding

EST. 2022

FFNT

Funded Futures Network

EST. 2022

FINOTIVE FUNDING

METRIC

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK

72/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

90%BETTER

PROFIT SPLIT

—80%

$300,000BETTER

MAX FUNDING

—$250,000

$49BETTER

MIN COST

—$81

7d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER0d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

FINOTIVE FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5
TYPES: forex

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: Rithmic, Onyx, Quantower

Finotive Funding PROS

+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
+Min challenge cost of $49 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7
+On-demand payouts offer greater flexibility than monthly or bi-weekly schedules
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, maximising trading flexibility

Finotive Funding CONS

−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation
−Max funding of $300,000 is below the industry average of $839,272.7
−Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps

Funded Futures Network PROS

+Min challenge cost of $81 is well below the industry average of $186.7, significantly reducing entry costs.
+Days to first payout of 0 means instant payouts, far better than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+On-demand payout frequency gives traders maximum flexibility in accessing their profits.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.

Funded Futures Network CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
−Max funding of $250,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting scale.
−Two-step funding process is above the industry average of 1.6 steps, adding an extra evaluation hurdle.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Finotive Funding

Higher trust score (72/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.

START WITH FINO