RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Finotive Funding vs DeiFunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Finotive Funding
FINO
Finotive Funding
EST. 2022
DEIF
DeiFunded
FINOTIVE FUNDING
METRIC
DEIFUNDED
72/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$300,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$49
MIN COST
—
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

FINOTIVE FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex

DEIFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

Finotive Funding PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7
  • +On-demand payouts offer greater flexibility than monthly or bi-weekly schedules
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, maximising trading flexibility

Finotive Funding CONS

  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation
  • −Max funding of $300,000 is below the industry average of $839,272.7
  • −Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps

DeiFunded PROS

  • +No data is available to identify any pros for DeiFunded at this time.
  • +No platform or market information is provided to assess trading conditions.
  • +No funding or cost data is available to compare against industry benchmarks.
  • +No profit split or payout data exists to evaluate trader compensation.

DeiFunded CONS

  • −No data whatsoever is available for DeiFunded, making any evaluation impossible.
  • −Complete absence of key metrics such as drawdown, profit split, and funding is a significant transparency concern.
  • −Traders have no basis for comparison against industry averages with zero data disclosed.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Finotive Funding
Higher trust score (72/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.
DeiFunded
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

Finotive Funding Full Review →DeiFunded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy