RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Finotive Funding vs Bulenox

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Finotive Funding
FINO
Finotive Funding
EST. 2022
Bulenox
BLNX
Bulenox
EST. 2022
FINOTIVE FUNDING
METRIC
BULENOX
72/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—71/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
—80%
$300,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$150,000
$49BETTER
MIN COST
—$99
7dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—14d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

FINOTIVE FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex

BULENOX DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Rithmic, Tradovate
TYPES
futures

Finotive Funding PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7
  • +On-demand payouts offer greater flexibility than monthly or bi-weekly schedules
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, maximising trading flexibility

Finotive Funding CONS

  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation
  • −Max funding of $300,000 is below the industry average of $839,272.7
  • −Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps

Bulenox PROS

  • +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
  • +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation easier to pass.
  • +Supports multiple platforms including NinjaTrader, Rithmic, and Tradovate.
  • +News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted.

Bulenox CONS

  • −Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Finotive Funding
Higher trust score (72/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.
Bulenox
Lower trust score (71/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Finotive Funding Full Review →Bulenox Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy