RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Finotive Funding vs Apex Trader Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FINO

Finotive Funding

EST. 2022

APEX

Apex Trader Funding

✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2021

FINOTIVE FUNDING

METRIC

APEX TRADER FUNDING

72/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—61/100

0/5—

RATING

BETTER4/5

90%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE90%

$300,000TIE

MAX FUNDING

TIE$300,000

$49—

MIN COST

BETTER$35

7dBETTER

PAYOUT DAYS

—8d

—

PASS RATE

31%

0—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER1

FINOTIVE FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5
TYPES: forex

APEX TRADER FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5
TYPES: futures, large-cap

Finotive Funding PROS

+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
+Min challenge cost of $49 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7
+On-demand payouts offer greater flexibility than monthly or bi-weekly schedules
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, maximising trading flexibility

Finotive Funding CONS

−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation
−Max funding of $300,000 is below the industry average of $839,272.7
−Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps

Apex Trader Funding PROS

+Min challenge cost of $35 is among the lowest and far below the industry average of $186.7
+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
+Single-step funding is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps

Apex Trader Funding CONS

−Futures firm uses a dollar-based drawdown structure; overall drawdown percentage is not directly comparable to the 7.9% CFD average
−Days to first payout of 8 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days
−Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure

PROPDNA VERDICT

Finotive Funding

Higher trust score (72/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.

START WITH FINO