RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Funded Futures Network vs MyFlashFunding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FFNT
Funded Futures Network
EST. 2022
MFFL
MyFlashFunding
FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK
METRIC
MYFLASHFUNDING
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$250,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
$200,000
$81
MIN COST
BETTER$15
0dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
1d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
Rithmic, Onyx, Quantower

MYFLASHFUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, Sway Charts

Funded Futures Network PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $81 is well below the industry average of $186.7, significantly reducing entry costs.
  • +Days to first payout of 0 means instant payouts, far better than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +On-demand payout frequency gives traders maximum flexibility in accessing their profits.
  • +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.

Funded Futures Network CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
  • Max funding of $250,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting scale.
  • Two-step funding process is above the industry average of 1.6 steps, adding an extra evaluation hurdle.

MyFlashFunding PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $15 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Fee refund is offered, reducing financial risk for traders who pass the challenge.
  • +On-demand payouts provide maximum flexibility for accessing profits.

MyFlashFunding CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • Profit target of 15% is well above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation significantly harder to pass.
  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Funded Futures Network
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 0d. 80% profit split.
MyFlashFunding
Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Funded Futures Network Full Review →MyFlashFunding Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy