RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Funded Futures Network vs Lux Trading Firm

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

FFNT

Funded Futures Network

EST. 2022

LUXT

Lux Trading Firm

EST. 2019

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK

METRIC

LUX TRADING FIRM

59/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—58/100

4/5BETTER

RATING

—2.8/5

80%BETTER

PROFIT SPLIT

—75%

$250,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$10,000,000

$81BETTER

MIN COST

—$100

0dBETTER

PAYOUT DAYS

—7d

—

PASS RATE

—

1—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER3

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: Rithmic, Onyx, Quantower

LUX TRADING FIRM DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES: forex, advanced, large-cap

Funded Futures Network PROS

+Min challenge cost of $81 is well below the industry average of $186.7, significantly reducing entry costs.
+Days to first payout of 0 means instant payouts, far better than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+On-demand payout frequency gives traders maximum flexibility in accessing their profits.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.

Funded Futures Network CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
−Max funding of $250,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting scale.
−Two-step funding process is above the industry average of 1.6 steps, adding an extra evaluation hurdle.

Lux Trading Firm PROS

+Max funding of $10,000,000 vastly exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7, offering elite scaling potential.
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, providing a faster path to capital.
+Min challenge cost of $100 is below the industry average of $186.7, keeping entry costs reasonable.
+Fixed drawdown type gives traders clear and stable risk parameters to plan around.

Lux Trading Firm CONS

−Profit split of 75% is notably below the industry average of 84.7%, significantly reducing trader earnings.
−Payout frequency is monthly, which is slower than most firms offering weekly or bi-weekly payouts.
−News trading is not allowed and fee refund is unavailable, reducing trader flexibility and cost recovery options.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Funded Futures Network

Higher trust score (59/100). Faster payouts at 0d. 80% profit split.

START WITH FFNT